# Glass Health: reviews and analysis > Support for differential diagnosis and clinical management plans, always with a doctor's review in front. - Canonical: https://serchai.com/en/reviews/glass-health/ - Site: Serchai (https://serchai.com) — AI tools comparator - Language: en - Updated: 2026-07-27 --- ## Verdict Glass Health solves a different problem than an ambient scribe: clinical reasoning support, with differential diagnoses and management plans the doctor must review before applying, not a substitute for clinical judgement. Founded by a UCSF-trained physician, it publishes a clear pricing ladder unusual for the sector: a free plan and rates from $20, $90 and $200 a month depending on capacity and EHR integration. It is a small company, with the support capacity that implies. **Best for:** Doctors and residents wanting a second opinion on tough diagnoses, with clear plans starting from free. **Rating:** 3.5/5 ## Pros - Public, transparent pricing ladder with a free tier, unusual for diagnostic support - Built by a clinical founder (a UCSF- and Harvard-trained physician) - Explicit support design, not substitution: requires a doctor's review before using the output ## Cons - EHR integration is only available on the priciest plan, from $200 a month - Small company with modest funding, which may limit support against bigger rivals ## Key facts - Price: Permanent free tier + paid from 20 USD - Free trial: No - Platforms: Web, iOS - Categories: [Productivity](https://serchai.com/en/best-ai/productivity/) - Official website: https://glass.health ## What the internet says (agentic sweep) Independent medical reviews rate differential quality well for common cases, with reported lower reliability in complex multisystem cases. What is rare in this sector is that it publishes a clear pricing ladder, including a free tier. - Sweep date: 2026-07-27 - Derived score: 3.5/5 ### Axes - Results: 3.5/5 - Control: 3.8/5 - Real price: 4/5 - Integration: 3.3/5 - Support: 3/5 ### Recurring themes in favor - It publishes a pricing ladder with a free tier and fixed rates, unusual among clinical diagnostic-support tools (strong theme) - It is explicitly designed as support, not substitution: it requires a doctor's review before applying any suggestion (strong theme) ### Recurring themes against - EHR integration (Epic, eClinicalWorks, Athena) is only available on the priciest plan, from $200 a month (present theme) - Independent medical reviews note lower reliability in complex multisystem cases compared to more common diagnoses (present theme) ### Sweep sources - [Official pricing] https://glass.health/compare/deepscribe — Tabla de precios (Lite gratis, Starter 20$, Pro 90$, Max desde 200$) transcrita del dominio oficial, comprobado el 2026-07-27 - [Press] https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/08/glass-health-is-building-an-ai-for-suggesting-medical-diagnoses/ — Cobertura fundacional: fundadores, modelo de negocio, posicionamiento como apoyo al razonamiento clínico - [Review sites] https://clinicalaireport.com/reviews/glass-health — Valoración de 3,8/5 sobre 15 reseñas médicas, actualizado el 2026-05-20 - [App stores] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/glass-health/id6746718047 — App «Glass for Clinicians» confirmada en iOS, versión 1.14, comprobado el 2026-07-27 > **TLDR:** Glass Health solves a different problem than an ambient scribe: clinical reasoning support, with differential diagnoses and management plans the doctor must review before applying, not a substitute for clinical judgement. Founded by a UCSF-trained physician, it publishes a clear pricing ladder unusual for the sector: a free plan and rates from $20, $90 and $200 a month depending on capacity and EHR integration. ## What Glass Health is and how it works Glass Health describes itself as a "GPS for clinical reasoning": from a natural-language case description, it generates differential diagnoses and draft management or treatment plans. It does not replace medical judgement: every output must be verified by a qualified clinician before use with a patient, and the product makes that explicit in its design. It was founded in 2021 by Dereck Paul, a physician trained at UCSF and Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard, and went through Y Combinator's Winter 2023 batch. It targets mostly practicing physicians, residents and medical students, with a particularly good fit in primary care, internal medicine and emergency medicine, per third-party reviews. ## What using it is like day to day Independent medical reviews describe good differential quality for common cases, with reported lower reliability in complex multisystem cases, where the tool has less room to get it right without more clinical context. That is a reasonable pattern for a support tool: it performs better the clearer the picture. Being a small company, with modest funding compared to the big players in clinical documentation, support capacity and development pace are smaller than better-capitalized rivals. That does not rule it out, but it is worth keeping in mind if you are looking for a vendor with dedicated enterprise support. ## Pricing and plans Here Glass Health does something almost no one in this sector does: publish a full pricing ladder. Lite is free, with limited ambient scribing and clinical support. Starter costs $20 a month ($18 annually) and adds standard clinical support. Pro rises to $90 a month ($81 annually) with extended reasoning. Max, from $200 a month ($180 annually), adds EHR integration (Epic, eClinicalWorks, Athena via SMART on FHIR). Worth stating with nuance: the pricing page uses a JavaScript-loaded interface that does not always show figures on direct load, though those same figures appear consistently on other pages of the same official domain, with a repeated 10% annual discount across all three paid tiers, which gives the data internal consistency. ## Who it is for (and who it is not for) It fits doctors, residents and students wanting a second opinion on tough diagnoses, and who value starting free and upgrading only if they need to. It does not fit anyone needing EHR integration from day one without paying $200 a month, nor anyone looking for the dedicated enterprise support of a large company: Glass Health is, for now, a small company. ## Alternatives to Glass Health [Nabla](https://serchai.com/en/reviews/nabla/) and [Freed](https://serchai.com/en/reviews/freed/) solve a complementary problem: documenting the visit, not supporting the diagnosis. If what you want is digitizing the clinical note rather than a second diagnostic opinion, those two fit better. ## Verdict Glass Health brings something this sector needs: real price transparency, with a genuinely free tier and a clear table of what each capacity level costs. That, combined with a design requiring medical review before acting, makes it easy to evaluate and to justify to a clinical committee. What is worth weighing is its size: it is a small company against much larger rivals, and that can show up in support and in how long it takes to resolve an issue if one comes up. ## Alternatives - [Nabla](https://serchai.com/en/reviews/nabla/) — European ambient AI that documents the visit and generates the clinical note in the EHR. (3.4/5) - [Heidi Health](https://serchai.com/en/reviews/heidi-health/) — AI medical scribe: the consultation documents itself and the clinician reviews and signs. (3.2/5)