The best alternatives to Harvey
Harvey might not be the right fit: the price, a missing feature or a payment model you don't like. These are the closest alternatives in our catalog, ordered by rating, with the full review of each one.
Why look for a Harvey alternative
This week brings only business news, no product changes. Harvey is reportedly in talks for a $500 million round at a $15.5 billion valuation, reported on August 7 by several financial outlets but not confirmed by the company. It also named Steve Zad chief revenue officer (August 4) and German firm HEUKING expanded Harvey's use to all professional groups at the firm (August 5), both announced only on Harvey's own blog. The /pricing route still returns a 404 error: still no public rate card, and the leaked per-seat estimates circulating on Reddit and LinkedIn, from $1,200 to $2,500 a month, are not new. They have been repeating for months with no confirmation from Harvey.
What its own users repeat in the August 11, 2026 sweep:
- There is no public pricing page: the only route is a sales demo and a case-by-case negotiated contract (strong theme)
- The volume of independent reviews on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights is low relative to the adoption the company itself reports (present theme)
Best alternatives to Harvey
vLex's legal assistant on its own document base: research, litigation and contracts with the source cited.
Agentic operating system for European firms: research, drafting and contract review in Word and Outlook.
What the internet says about each alternative
vLex Vincent AI 4/5 · Price on request
The web still agrees vLex's document base, not the model, is Vincent's edge, and January added Vincent Studio so large firms can build no-code workflows. The first known independent benchmark (VLAIR) confirms it outperforms lawyers on several tasks but lands 26 points behind on contract redlining. It still has no public price, and the Fastcase-Alexi lawsuit over caselaw data remains unresolved as of August 2026.
Where it wins: vLex's own base, with more than a billion documents from over a hundred countries, is what separates Vincent from a general assistant that writes well Where it slips: There is no public price anywhere: the only route is a sales demo, which shuts out the small firm that wants to try it and decide on its own
Legora 3.6/5 · Price on request
Today's sweep still finds no public price: legora.com/pricing keeps returning a 404, same as the past two weeks. The only figures circulating are unofficial estimates from third-party buyer guides, between $3,000 and $8,000 per seat per year, which no source attributes to Legora and the company does not confirm. This week the firm hired Bryan Tsao, former Jasper CPO, as its new Chief Product Officer on August 4, and added US federal and state case law and statutory coverage to its research engine on August 5. Neither event moves the axes yet: both are recent announcements with no usage data behind them. The rest of the picture holds: strong adoption at large firms and no reference price in any source checked.
Where it wins: Crowell & Moring reports that 91% of its more than seven hundred lawyers use Legora after six months of firm-wide rollout Where it slips: No published rate anywhere: the pricing page errors out and the only access is a sales demo. The only figures in circulation ($3,000-$8,000 per seat per year) are third-party estimates that Legora neither confirms nor lists on its site
Comparison table
| Tool | Price | Free trial | Platforms | Rating | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey | Price on request | No | Web, iOS, Android | VisitHarvey (opens in a new tab) | |
| vLex Vincent AI | Price on request | Yes | Web | VisitvLex Vincent AI (opens in a new tab) | |
| Legora | Price on request | No | Web | VisitLegora (opens in a new tab) |
Still unsure? Read the full review of Harvey?