Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: which should you choose?
Updated on
Which to choose
Developers who want AI inside the editor, not in a separate window.
Teams living in GitHub who want AI without changing tools.
Comparison table
| Tool | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The code editor built around AI, with agents inside the IDE. | The coding assistant built into GitHub and your IDE, from $10. |
| Categories | Code | Code |
| Price | From $20 | Free trial · from $10 |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows | Web, macOS, Windows |
| Rating | ||
| Best for | Developers who want AI inside the editor, not in a separate window. | Teams living in GitHub who want AI without changing tools. |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Link | Visit Cursor (opens in a new tab) Read the review | Visit GitHub Copilot (opens in a new tab) Read the review |
Our verdict
The same question with two answers: Copilot puts AI into the editor and platform you already use, while Cursor rebuilds the whole editor around AI. To try frictionlessly and pay little, Copilot wins with its free plan and $10 entry. For anyone coding daily with the agent, Cursor's integrated experience justifies the difference.
Full reviews: Cursor · GitHub Copilot
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
Copilot: a free plan with limits and a $10-a-month paid entry, against Cursor's $20 individual plan. Under intensive frontier-model use, both climb with consumption.
Do I have to switch editors for Cursor?
Yes and no: Cursor is its own editor, but it is built on the VS Code base, so extensions, shortcuts and settings migrate almost by themselves.
Which has the better agent?
Cursor's agent runs a step ahead on autonomy and integration with the editing flow. Copilot compensates with its GitHub presence: PR review and tasks assignable from the platform.